|
|
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
RE: BellSouth Monopoly Case Moves Forward
Maybe they realized the futility of their efforts and changed course....
-----Original Message-----
From: Roderick S. Beck [mailto:rodbeck@...Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 4:19 PM
To: isp-clec@isp-clec.com
Subject: Re: BellSouth Monopoly Case Moves Forward
Sprint wasn't a major CLEC. In fact, they were not on the map.
T and Worldcom are the two largest CLECs.
Buyer wrote:
>Interestingly enough, Sprint is closing down their local service POPs "all
>over Texas". The word I got was they weren't goint to be in the local phone
>business.
>Their local pop is stone cold. No running equipment.
>
>Looks like the ILEC monopolys are winning.
>
>CF
>
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jim Wagner" <jim@isp-lists.com>
>To: <isp-clec@isp-clec.com>
>Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 10:11 AM
>Subject: RE: BellSouth Monopoly Case Moves Forward
>
>
>>At 06:18 PM 8/2/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>>
>>>It's kinda like the seedling growing back after cutting down the tree.
>>>
>>Or "growing back to cut down the tree." I just talked to Verizon and they
>>insinuated AT&T is helping fund the current crop of court cases. Of
>>
>course,
>
>>the Bells say that every time anybody objects to their moves ;--)
>>
>>Jim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>-.-.-.-.This mail has been virus scanned and spam filtered.-.-.-.-
>
>
- Replies
-
- Re: BellSouth Monopoly Case Moves Forward, Roderick S. Beck
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
|
|
