|
|
<- Previous Message | Next Message -> Thread Index
[isp-caching] Re: CacheFlow caching engine Vs. Cisco Cache engine
the difference is that you and I know that the flexable small vendor is
a rather good risk. But the big guys just need stability and that pencil
pusher is not about to take the risk to back a small firm with a large order
Mike
Windows ASP .NET Cold Fusion Web Hosting Services http://www.adehost.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Gallagher [mailto:lists@...> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 6:37 PM
> To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> Subject: [isp-caching] Re: CacheFlow caching engine Vs. Cisco Cache
> engine
>
>
> Hey Mike,
>
> That's a very good saying. Truly you shouldn't underestimate the safety
> of buying from larger suppliers. But you should also understand the
> usual flexibility of the smaller ones. :)
>
> Kind Regards,
> Ryan Gallagher.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: adehost-sales [mailto:sales@...> Sent: 19 July 2003 14:27
> To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> Subject: [isp-caching] Re: CacheFlow caching engine Vs. Cisco Cache
> engine
>
> Ryan, back in the late 70's and early 80's there was a great saying...
>
> you never got fired for buying IBM
>
> this rule of thumb applies for the current thinking.
>
> Mike
>
> Windows ASP .NET Cold Fusion Web Hosting Services
> http://www.adehost.com
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ryan Gallagher [mailto:ryangallagher@...> > Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:16 PM
> > To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> > Subject: [isp-caching] Re: CacheFlow caching engine Vs. Cisco Cache
> > engine
> >
> >
> > Hi Illyse,
> >
> > I have tested the products (as well as Inktomi and Netapps) head to
> head
> > on a few occasions for different ISP/Companies (KPN, KPNQwest, Alstom,
> > etc). Not to be too blunt about it but the only people who choose the
> > Cisco products are those who either:
> >
> > a) Fear for the financial future of the competitors.
> > Or
> > b) Have a full Cisco House and wish to take advantage of keeping all
> > equipment under one vendor/support contract.
> >
>
>
>
> ____________
> ___________
>
>
>
>
>
>
- Replies
-
- [isp-caching] Re: CacheFlow caching engine Vs. Cisco Cache engine, Ryan Gallagher
<- Previous Message | Next Message -> Thread Index
|
|