|
|
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
[isp-caching] Re: CacheFlow caching engine Vs. Cisco Cache engine
Hey Mike,
That's a very good saying. Truly you shouldn't underestimate the safety
of buying from larger suppliers. But you should also understand the
usual flexibility of the smaller ones. :)
Kind Regards,
Ryan Gallagher.
-----Original Message-----
From: adehost-sales [mailto:sales@...Sent: 19 July 2003 14:27
To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
Subject: [isp-caching] Re: CacheFlow caching engine Vs. Cisco Cache
engine
Ryan, back in the late 70's and early 80's there was a great saying...
you never got fired for buying IBM
this rule of thumb applies for the current thinking.
Mike
Windows ASP .NET Cold Fusion Web Hosting Services
http://www.adehost.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Gallagher [mailto:ryangallagher@...> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 6:16 PM
> To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> Subject: [isp-caching] Re: CacheFlow caching engine Vs. Cisco Cache
> engine
>
>
> Hi Illyse,
>
> I have tested the products (as well as Inktomi and Netapps) head to
head
> on a few occasions for different ISP/Companies (KPN, KPNQwest, Alstom,
> etc). Not to be too blunt about it but the only people who choose the
> Cisco products are those who either:
>
> a) Fear for the financial future of the competitors.
> Or
> b) Have a full Cisco House and wish to take advantage of keeping all
> equipment under one vendor/support contract.
>
____________
___________
- Replies
-
- [isp-caching] Re: CacheFlow caching engine Vs. Cisco Cache engine, adehost-sales
- Replies
-
- [isp-caching] Re: CacheFlow caching engine Vs. Cisco Cache engine, adehost-sales
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
|
|
