|
|
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
[isp-caching] RE: interresting
what I found interesting about what you said is the overlooking
the opposite position.
I had come across an issue with gator ad serving and web sites
that the ISP controlled. the ISP asked me for advice. I said, "If
you block gator from your network without true cause that's
provable in court, you will loose your common carrier status"
You loose it due to the fact you are no longer neutral to the
packet's of info but are taking sides.
Mike
Windows ASP .NET Cold Fusion Web Hosting Services http://www.adehost.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathaniel Leibowitz [mailto:natan@...> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 1:25 AM
> To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> Subject: [isp-caching] RE: interresting
>
>
> Whichever way you look at it, it seems that ISP today must make a decision
> in a yet undefined legal issue.
> What must not be overlooked is that also the opposite position,
> in which ISP
> chooses to block p2p traffic, may get it in legal trouble.
>
- Replies
-
- [isp-caching] RE: interresting, Nathaniel Leibowitz
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
|
|
