|
|
<- Previous Message | Next Message -> Thread Index
[isp-caching] RE: interresting
I don't know if you have noticed, but Proxymus does support shaping as well.
I do agree with the point that Amos made that users should be entitled to do
whatever they want with the bandwidth they are paying for, but in some
cases, like the country I live in, you must do some compromises as well,
mainly due to the high costs of the International bandwidth. You want to
maximize the utilization of the resources available.
This was the main reason we have made this option available in our product,
to combine the best of both techniques and more. I say more, because with
Proxymus you can specify the periods when you want the shaping of the input
traffic to be enabled and when to just let it go.
Also, if you have enough bandwidth, you may set the limit high enough as
well just to set a threshold that you don't want P2P traffic to cross. Like
a safeguard from a sudden burst of traffic.
Ranko
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrick deroudilhe [mailto:pderoudi@...> Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 1:52 PM
> To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> Subject: [isp-caching] RE: interresting
>
>
> I do agree but maybe many of your customers are
> suffering because a limited number of them are
> aggressively consuming YOUR bandwidth (lets consider
> it is not unlimited)by starting large number of
> concurrent connections.
> That why Allot is also proposing a different approach
> to control P2P: fairness per users (and not per
> connections. No limitation - no application control -
> just equity per user when your bandwidth is congested.
>
> If you are concerned by doing "any effort to improve
> users experience" it could be a good complement !!
>
>
> --- Amos Rosenboim <r.amos@....il> wrote:
> > My own two cents:
> >
> > P2p is one of the great things that happened in the
> > internet.
> > It really follows the model of a great open public
> > network.
> > I don't want to limit or shape my users traffic
> > because I believe they
> > are entiteled to do what ever they want with the
> > bandwidth they are
> > paying for.
> > But since p2p is challanging my network I will do
> > any effort to improve
> > my users experience using caching/redirection like
> > the solutions from
> > expand/joltid/sandvine
> >
> > Regards
> > Amos
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: patrick deroudilhe [mailto:pderoudi@...> >
> > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 12:32 PM
> > To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> > Subject: [isp-caching] RE: interresting
> >
> > Question was :
> >
> > > Interesting indeed! Is anyone using any caching
> > engine to catch P2P traffic? Are there other
> > products
> > out there?
> >
> > You can also use Traffic shappers to control P2P
> > bandwidth allocation (I aggree it is different
> > approach).
> > www.allot.com is doing nice P2P
> > (KazaaV2-Gnutella)application recognition
> > (signature)
> > and shapping up to 1Gbps throughput. They also
> > propose
> > Transparent Cache Redirection option.
> >
> > Regards
> > Patrick
> > --- "Pablo A. Destefanis (Ecoband)"
> > <pablo@...> wrote:
> > > Thank you Amos and everyone.
> > >
> > > BTW, there's a pretty good white paper on caching
> > > P2P traffic that was
> > > written by Nathaniel Leibowitz, Aviv Bergman and
> > > others based on some
> > > very detailed tests they did with Amos (I think
> > so,
> > > am I right?).
> > >
> > > Very informative.
> > > (http://2002.iwcw.org/papers/18500253.pdf)
> > >
> > > Does anyone ever tried to use iptables to do the
> > L4
> > > switching on a
> > > multihomed Linux box? I don't have the budget for
> > an
> > > Alteon box... ;-)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Pablo.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Amos Rosenboim [mailto:r.amos@...> > > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 08:38
> > > To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> > > Subject: [isp-caching] RE: interresting
> > >
> > >
> > > The first p2p cache that i know of was developed
> > by
> > > expand networks from
> > > israel. I have two of 3 of those in my network for
> > > fastrack ( Kazza )
> > > traffic. It used to be very effective when kazza
> > was
> > > working on a single
> > > tcp port (1214). now we need to do all kinds of
> > > layer 4 -7 tricks to get
> > > the traffic to the cache. Every cache of mine
> > deals
> > > with roughly
> > > 100Mbits/sec. Expand networks stopped the
> > > development of their product,
> > > however, since then there are new products like
> > > mushrooms. the examples
> > > i know of:
> > >
> > > Joltid - the same people who are behind kazza,
> > they
> > > have a very nice
> > > product.
> > >
> > >
> > > Sandvine - more complicated product then most of
> > > them but a vey serious
> > > compnay.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Amos
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Moshe Konortov [mailto:moshek@...> > > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 10:28 AM
> > > To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> > > Subject: [isp-caching] RE: interresting
> > >
> > > I'm doing it as a reseller for those product and
> > > also Expand doing it
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Moshe Konortov
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mark Pace Balzan
> > [mailto:mpb@...> > > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 8:28 AM
> > > To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> > > Subject: [isp-caching] RE: interresting
> > >
> > >
> > > Has anyone been using/testing these products
> > >
> > > care to comment about their performance and
> > > effectiveness.
> > >
> > >
> > > cheers
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Moshe Konortov" <moshek@ankor.co.il>
> > > To: <isp-caching@isp-caching.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 8:39 AM
> > > Subject: [isp-caching] RE: interresting
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Yes there are,
> > > >
> > > > Sandvine - at www.sandvine.com and cachelogic at
> > > www.cachelogic.com
> > > > They doing Edonkey and Fastrack and Gnutella.
> > > Sandvine is not a
> > > > caching system, its idea is to catch the p2p
> > > traffic and redirect it
> > > > to low cost lines
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Moshe Konortov
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Pablo A. Destefanis (Ecoband)
> > > [mailto:pablo@...> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:49 AM
> > > > To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> > > > Subject: [isp-caching] RE: interresting
> > > >
> > > > Interesting indeed! Is anyone using any caching
> > > engine to catch P2P
> > > > traffic? Are there other products out there?
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > > Pablo.
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Ranko Zivojnovic
> > > [mailto:ranko@...> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 01:47
> > > > To: isp-caching@isp-caching.com
> > > > Cc: thomas@...
> > > > Subject: [isp-caching] RE: interresting
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I believe that you will find the following very
> > > interesting too:
> > > >
> > > > http://proxymus.spidernet.net
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Ranko
> > > >
> >
> === message truncated ===
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
>
> ------------------------ANNOUNCEMENT---------------------------------
> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
> ** 802.11 Planet **
> The business of hot spots. Wireless ISP business plans.
> Wireless network certifications. High-gain antenna design.
> Site survey techniques.
> June 25 - 27, Boston, MA
> http://www.jupiterevents.com//80211/spring03
> *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
>
>
------------------------ANNOUNCEMENT---------------------------------
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
** 802.11 Planet **
The business of hot spots. Wireless ISP business plans.
Wireless network certifications. High-gain antenna design.
Site survey techniques.
June 25 - 27, Boston, MA
http://www.jupiterevents.com//80211/spring03
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-
- Replies
-
- [isp-caching] RE: interresting, patrick deroudilhe
<- Previous Message | Next Message -> Thread Index
|
|