|
Thread Index Re: [isp-bgp] TE practices when peered to two big upstreams?
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 23:03, joshua sahala wrote: > the question that i have is why do people want to see a totally even (or > as close to it as possible) distribution of traffic on their links, > especially when it will take messing with things that probably should > not be touched unless absolutely necessary? in my network, i like > stability and predictability...'routing magic' boxen tend to make things > much less stable and predictable (but then the traffic graphs have a nice > flat-line) Ohh...he did mention distribution, sorry 'bout that :-) Still, there's reasons to distribute traffic with probably pricing and different capacity links as the main ones. If you buy a certain CDR with burst from two providers, you don't want to be paying burst on one while not using your CDR on the other. Cheers, -- --- Erik Haagsman Network Architect We Dare BV tel: +31.10.7507008 fax: +31.10.7507005 http://www.we-dare.nl To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. Copyright 2005 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.
Thread Index |
|
