|
Thread Index Re: [isp-bgp] TE practices when peered to two big upstreams?
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 23:03, joshua sahala wrote: > > the question that i have is why do people want to see a totally even (or > as close to it as possible) distribution of traffic on their links, > especially when it will take messing with things that probably should > not be touched unless absolutely necessary? in my network, i like > stability and predictability...'routing magic' boxen tend to make things > much less stable and predictable (but then the traffic graphs have a nice > flat-line) No-one mentioned even distribution...colohost mentioned the "better path" which you will not get by relying on as-path as a metric. BTW...I said boxes like RouteScience won't fit any situation, I merely mentioned them as an option (that I would't use either) for tweaking BGP. -- --- Erik Haagsman Network Architect We Dare BV tel: +31.10.7507008 fax: +31.10.7507005 http://www.we-dare.nl To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. Copyright 2005 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.
Thread Index |
|
