|
Thread Index Re: [isp-bgp] BGP Anycast: one AS or several?
On 05/01/2005, at 11:41 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: The only problem I see is that "anycast only" sites will not accept the announce for UP/22 (because their AS is in it) and so will not be able to reach the legacy unicast prefix. Not a big problem, there is no communication between nameserver sites, anyway and we can always set up a static route. If this is your only concern then simply bringing up a tunnel from each of the "anycast only" sites to the original site just for traffic back to the unicast servers would be a reasonable solution. The sites would then be directly connected and happy to be in the same AS. Either statics or iBGP would complete the picture. Naturally, the anycast prefix would not be included in your igp. David ... To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. Copyright 2005 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.
Thread Index |
|
