Internet.com
Get your
ISP-News
courtesy of
internetnews.com




Search ISP-Lists
Search:
ISP Channel
CLEC-Planet
ISP Glossary
ISP News
ISP-Planet
ISP-Lists
E-mail Newsletters
Opt-in Announcements
Discussion Forums
internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology
International

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

The ISP-Lists.com Email Discussion List Community

<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
Re: [isp-bgp] ibgp behavior with two links to same neighbor AS
  • To: isp-bgp@isp-bgp.com
  • Subject: Re: [isp-bgp] ibgp behavior with two links to same neighbor AS
  • From: Jeffrey Belles <jaffa@...>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:42:40 +0100

Hi,

Colo Host schreef:
Hi all, can someone tell me the normal behavior of iBGP
between two routers who both peer with the same remote
AS? I have two routers peered with each other in my AS
and they both have a link to the same remote AS and are
receiving full routes. Should my two routers be sharing
their learned routes with each other even though they're
basically learning the same thing?
It is too easy to imply that they are basically learning the same thing. If you peer with one AS at two different locations, these two eBGP peers can hold different routing information. They just advertise _their_ best route. And they can be sending MEDs with their advertisements.

If that is the case they are also not sharing their full table.

I'm seeing just one
share its routes with the other but not vice versa, so if
that one loses it's link to the remote AS, traffic trying
to leave via that router gets stuck.  It does start flowing
again about two minutes later because it seems the loss
of that upstream link causes it to start receiving, or the
other router to start advertising, the routes out through
that other router.

In respect of my previous comment:
if you have router A & B peering with the same upstream AS, then in some cases router A and B might prefer the internal routes (learned via eachother) to get to certain prefixes.


|-----------------------------|
| AS1 |
|---rtr1--------------rtr2----|
| |
A | B |
| |
|--rtrx--------------rtry-----|
| AS2 |
|-----------------------------|


Say rtr1 advertises a prefix 10/8 with a MED of 5, and rtr2 is sending it with a MED of 10.

rtry will actually prefer to reach the 10/8 block over its internal neighbor rtrx and not advertise the rtr2 path.

If then link A would break, and the session expires, rtrx withdraws the routes learned from rtr1 and then rtry will advertise to rtrx the one he learned from eBGP.

HTH,
-Jeffrey


If that is normal behavior, are there common tricks that can
be used to increase the propagation speed of routes via
BGP, external and internal?  I'm finding that in a mixed-vendor
network, some combos fully load the Internet table much
quicker than others from their peers where bandwidth is
not the limiting factor.

Thanks,

D






To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Copyright 2004 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.






To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Copyright 2004 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.

Replies
[isp-bgp] ibgp behavior with two links to same neighbor AS, Colo Host
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index

ISP Glossary
Find an ISP Term

Need Help?

JupiterOnlineMedia

internet.comearthweb.comDevx.commediabistro.comGraphics.com

Search:

Jupitermedia Corporation has two divisions: Jupiterimages and JupiterOnlineMedia

Jupitermedia Corporate Info


Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, & Permissions, Privacy Policy.

Advertise | Newsletters | Tech Jobs | Shopping | E-mail Offers