Internet.com
Get your
ISP-News
courtesy of
internetnews.com




Search ISP-Lists
Search:
ISP Channel
CLEC-Planet
ISP Glossary
ISP News
ISP-Planet
ISP-Lists
E-mail Newsletters
Opt-in Announcements
Discussion Forums
internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology
International

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

The ISP-Lists.com Email Discussion List Community

<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
Re:[isp-bgp] BGP for multi-homing to the same provider entail using a
  • To: isp-bgp@isp-bgp.com
  • Subject: Re:[isp-bgp] BGP for multi-homing to the same provider entail using a
  • From: "C. Jon Larsen" <jlarsen@...>
  • Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:40:05 -0500 (EST)

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, FeatureBug wrote:

> 
> Yes There is: RFC 1930 - Guidelines for creation,
> selection, and registration of an Autonomous System
> (AS)
>  The other one is by RIPE: Autonomous System (AS)
> Number Assignment Policies and Procedures at 
> ftp://ftp.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-263.txt
> 
> Please refer these documents to Sprint to make your
> case.

I'm sorry, I can't make out what you are saying. Are you saying that ISPs 
are now requiring a public ASN even when there is no need for externally 
visible unique routing policy to the rest of the internet ? Or are you 
saying I have a case ?


Maybe I'm not being very clear. Let me try again. I want to use a private 
ASN - like 65001 for example, to peer with an upstream (Sprint) to 
announce routes that will never be seen by the rest of the internet - 
just my upstream - to control ingres routing.

I'm getting pushback saying you have to have a public ASN. This makes no 
sense and is contrary to the spirit beyond the concept of an ASN. I don't 
need a unique routing policy that is *different* from Sprints. I don't 
need visibility of my prefixes beyond Sprint's AS.

Why do we need to exhaust ASN supply, and add yet another /24 to routing 
table bloat (as getting an ASN will now make my prefix de-aggregated) when 
I am simply multi-homed to the *same* provider.

I have read the RFC you mentioned before. It supports my position. Folks, 
UUNet used to do this all the time (been a year+ since I worked with them, 
Savvis does it, and other providers have to in the past).

Maybe I'll ask around elsewhere. 

> 
> Best Regards
> Rahul Sawarkar
> 
> 
> 		
> __________________________________ 
> Do you Yahoo!? 
> Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> 




> To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
> Jupitermedia Corp.
> Attn: Discussion List Management
> 475 Park Avenue South
> New York, NY 10016
> 
> Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
> 
> Copyright 2004 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.
> 
> 

-- 
+ Jon Larsen: President/CTO, Richweb, Inc.
+ Richweb.com: Providing Internet-Based Business Solutions since 1995
+ GnuPG Public Key: http://richweb.com/jlarsen.gpg
+ Business: (804) 747.8592 x 101; Mobile: (804) 307.6939






To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Copyright 2004 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.

Replies
Re:[isp-bgp] BGP for multi-homing to the same provider entail using a, FeatureBug
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index

ISP Glossary
Find an ISP Term

Need Help?

JupiterOnlineMedia

internet.comearthweb.comDevx.commediabistro.comGraphics.com

Search:

Jupitermedia Corporation has two divisions: Jupiterimages and JupiterOnlineMedia

Jupitermedia Corporate Info


Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, & Permissions, Privacy Policy.

Advertise | Newsletters | Tech Jobs | Shopping | E-mail Offers