Internet.com
Get your
ISP-News
courtesy of
internetnews.com




Search ISP-Lists
Search:
ISP Channel
CLEC-Planet
ISP Glossary
ISP News
ISP-Planet
ISP-Lists
E-mail Newsletters
Opt-in Announcements
Discussion Forums
internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology
International

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

The ISP-Lists.com Email Discussion List Community

<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
[isp-bgp] Re: Suggested solution to prevent my prefixes from being suppressed
  • To: isp-bgp@isp-bgp.com
  • Subject: [isp-bgp] Re: Suggested solution to prevent my prefixes from being suppressed
  • From: mmostafa@...
  • Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 21:24:31 +0200

Dear James and colleagues ,
First of all im very gratefull for your contribution all of you , and
im really very happy to be a member of this BGP working group .
Well , we have exactly 2 GTWs each one has a separte BGP session one with
FLAG NY ,and FLAG LNDN as i mentioned before we use flag NY as the main link while LNDN is a bckup for both up & downstream traffic except some small volumes of certain classes
form my observation during the past 2 monthes i can say that our session with FLAG LNDN is more stable than FLAG NY , and attacks are of that type consuming B.W so what happen is we got BGP-SESSION down due to Hold timer expired + Some EIGRP sessions also reset due to hold time along DPVCs carrying the attack .
Our traffic policy is implemented by sending our prefixes with two differnt communities and flag apply differnt LP for each path NY & LNDN
We confirmed with flag that our prefixes are of same attributes at thier edge routers so damping may be due to reannouncement
I wana to confirm that Flag doesnt aply damping to its customers plus fastfallover is disabled from both sides as per our request .
Regarding my suggestion which is advertiseing more specific and aggregating
at flag Edge routers keeping the as path information as its in as-set form :
If im not the owner of the prefixs , i dont have the right to aggregate these prefixes "" is this true or false ??



James writes:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 08:08:39AM -0500, Pete Templin wrote:

Several suggestions:
1) Why are your BGP sessions flapping? BGP packets are normally precedence 6, and should in many cases pass through nearly any saturated link. Determining why they're flapping is probably a good thing to research first.
       _____________________________________________________

       ** ISPCON Fall 2004 - Santa Clara Convention Center **
        ** The ISP and WISP event - http://www.ispcon.com **
** Fill your brain.  Meet the people.  Join the industry gathering. **
      ________________________________________________________






To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Replies
[isp-bgp] Suggested solution to prevent my prefixes from being suppressed (fwd), mmostafa
[isp-bgp] Re: Suggested solution to prevent my prefixes from beingsuppressed (fwd), Ton Schoenmakers
[isp-bgp] Re: Suggested solution to prevent my prefixes frombeing suppressed (fwd), Pete Templin
[isp-bgp] Re: Suggested solution to prevent my prefixes from being suppressed, mmostafa
[isp-bgp] Re: Suggested solution to prevent my prefixes frombeing suppressed, Pete Templin
[isp-bgp] Re: Suggested solution to prevent my prefixes from being suppressed, James
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index

ISP Glossary
Find an ISP Term

Need Help?

JupiterOnlineMedia

internet.comearthweb.comDevx.commediabistro.comGraphics.com

Search:

Jupitermedia Corporation has two divisions: Jupiterimages and JupiterOnlineMedia

Jupitermedia Corporate Info


Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, & Permissions, Privacy Policy.

Advertise | Newsletters | Tech Jobs | Shopping | E-mail Offers