[isp-bgp] Re: isp-bgp digest: September 28, 2004

[Dean Anderson <dean@...>]

>
> It does if you have equal cost metric routes.
> 'ip load-sharing_(per-packet|per-destination)' requires a FIB, aka cef enabled.
> If however using MLPPP, cef is irrelevant.. although I find MLPPP to tax quite a
> chunk of cpu on the router..

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120limit/120s/120s21/pplb.htm
Holy new features batman...(respectfully)  Does this work on the 2600s?

> But really... trying to combine bandwidth and gain "load balancing of bits or
> increase throughput" with BGP is like trying to nail something with something
> other than a hammer.

Agreed. I always find this mucking to be dubious and more often results in
self induced outages.

>
--
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000



         _____________________________________________________

         ** ISPCON Fall 2004 - Santa Clara Convention Center **
         ** The ISP and WISP event - http://www.ispcon.com  **
** Register at the current rate and bring a buddy too for only $350. **
        ________________________________________________________






To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.