|
<- Previous Message | Next Message -> Thread Index [isp-bgp] Re: Outbound Balancing
Joe Pruett wrote: you can also use med values as a way to make selections.Except that the MED simply doesn't matter on your router unless you're always comparing MED (which is not a default setting). Folks, use the tools in the manner that they're suggested, rather than a convoluted way, since there's obviously a wide selection of tools in the tool kit. To manage your outbound traffic: 1) Adjust weight if you have Cisco and you want to influence the decision on this one router only (caveat: this could change the "best path" selected on this router and therefore propagated to other routers if it's a border router). 2) Adjust local preference if you want to prefer a specific exit point essentially across your network. 3) Add prepends if you want to de-influence a specific exit point unless your preferred exit point(s) encounters a loss of connectivity in or beyond their network (which might result in the prepended path becoming best as a result of the outage). 4) Use MED to manage outbound traffic only if you have multiple pipes to the same upstream (the default scenario where MED even matters). Consider additive MED if your platform supports it and you can get a strong sense of the MED values from your upstream. To manage your inbound traffic: 1) Add prepends if you want to de-influence a specific entrance point, while still allowing point outages (which probably result in a longer AS path) to trigger convergence away from the break point. 2) Attach communities to your routes based on your upstream policy to request specific values of local preference in their network and their upstreams' networks. Pete To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
Thread Index |