On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Haesu wrote:

> Anthony said 99% inbound traffic. Full routes from his providers will do 
> nothing but waste CPU+memory for hiim.

You have to be able to connect to a site before you can download from it.  
Have things like C&W depeering PSI already been forgotten?  Two default 
routes will work most of the time, but you can do better...and you already 
have the necessary hardware.

That 7206vxr NPE300 should be able to do 6 transit T1s and 2 BGP sessions 
without breaking a sweat.  If you haven't already, turn on CEF.  You'll 
get occasional CPU spikes from BGP, but that's normal.
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Jon Lewis *jlewis@...*|  I route
 System Administrator        |  therefore you are
 Atlantic Net                |  
_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________


------------------------ANNOUNCEMENT---------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
           ISPCON FALL 2003 - Santa Clara Convention Center
     October 20-22 - The Definitive Event Wired and Wireless ISPs
                            www.ispcon.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Replies

[isp-bgp] RE: Smaller ISP, do we need full BGP routes?, Haesu