Internet.com
Get your
ISP-News
courtesy of
internetnews.com




Search ISP-Lists
Search:
ISP Channel
CLEC-Planet
ISP Glossary
ISP News
ISP-Planet
ISP-Lists
E-mail Newsletters
Opt-in Announcements
Discussion Forums
internet.com
IT
Developer
Internet News
Small Business
Personal Technology
International

Search internet.com
Advertise
Corporate Info
Newsletters
Tech Jobs
E-mail Offers

The ISP-Lists.com Email Discussion List Community

<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index
[isp-bgp] iBGP not working properly ?
Hi,

We recently added a second transit link to our network and set up BGP on the link.

The current situation is this :


                    PC
                    |
Switch1 -------- Switch2
   |                |
Router1 -------- Router2
   |                |
Transit1         Transit2


Router1 has a BGP link to Transit1, Router2 to Transit2, both 
get the full routing table.
Router1 and Router2 have an iBGP link.

The 'loop' at Router1-Router2-Switch1-Switch2 uses STP, so no 
problems there. The default gateway for PC is Switch2, the 
default for Switch2 is Router2.

So far, so good.

When we connected Transit2 to Router2, we noticed that the 
routing table in both Router1 and Router2 changed quite a bit, 
which was to be expected. Most routes went via Transit2, which 
was normal, because the AS path length was shorter.

However, when the path length is the same and we perform a 
traceroute on both Router1 and Router2 to the same host, they 
both go out via a different link... their own. I don't think 
that's normal, right ?


Second problem : when I get a summary of the BGP, this is what 
I get :

Router 1 :
Core1# bgp show summary    
Neighbor        V    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent      Up/Down Prefixes 
Rcvd/Sent
--------        -    -- ------- -------      ------- ---------
---------
[Group Id: transit1]
212.23.45.137   4  8928   81494    9792   1d3h11m26s    
120248/1
[Group Id: ibgp]
62.213.192.18   4 28707  364891  169743   1d23h32m2s    
115210/20896
BGP summary, 2 groups, 2 peers
Core1# 


Router 2:
core2# bgp show summary  
Neighbor        V    AS MsgRcvd MsgSent      Up/Down Prefixes 
Rcvd/Sent
--------        -    -- ------- -------      ------- ---------
---------
[Group Id: transit2]
64.212.16.113   4  3549  235153    3328    1d3h42m9s    
120464/1
[Group Id: ibgp]
62.213.192.17   4 28707  128012  329835   1d23h34m7s     
20898/115223
BGP summary, 2 groups, 2 peers
core2# 


If I read this correctly, Router1 only sent 20896 prefixes to 
Router2, although it received 120248 from Transit1. On the 
other hand, Router2 sent 115223 to Router1 and it received 
120464 from Transit2... where does that difference come from ? 
Why doesn't Router1 send all of its routes to Router2 ? Is 
that the reason why most routes go via Transit2 ?


Any suggestions would be very nice.


Kind greetings,

Wim

------------------------ANNOUNCEMENT---------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
                         >> ISP Technology <<
VPN, DNS Security Management, spam, 3G, WLAN Security, P2P, VoIP, PLC,
                    802.11i, 802.1x and much more!
       http://www.wispcon.com/spring2003/attend-sessionlist.asp
        The 10th Annual ISPcon, Baltimore Waterfront Marriott
                             April 23-25
----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Replies
[isp-bgp] Re: iBGP not working properly ?, Jacques VUVANT
<- Previous Message | Next Message ->
Thread Index

ISP Glossary
Find an ISP Term

Need Help?

JupiterOnlineMedia

internet.comearthweb.comDevx.commediabistro.comGraphics.com

Search:

Jupitermedia Corporation has two divisions: Jupiterimages and JupiterOnlineMedia

Jupitermedia Corporate Info


Legal Notices, Licensing, Reprints, & Permissions, Privacy Policy.

Advertise | Newsletters | Tech Jobs | Shopping | E-mail Offers