|
Thread Index Re: Route-Reflection
Sadd Sheikh, To start with route reflector peers fall into two catagories: clients and non-clients. Your scenario does not show both types of peers. The client peers are required only if they can not fulfill the mesh requirements of a non-client. Thus, I don't see how a route could be relected from a non-client to client peers. FYI: If a route is recv'd from a client peer it is then reflected back to both client and non-client peers. Mitchell Erblich ========================= SAAD SHEIKH wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have following scenario of Route Reflection which is self-explanatory, I > was wondering if anybody can tell me whatever I am finding is correct and if > not then under what reasons; > > | RR | > ------------| ------------- |------------ > | | | | > RR-ClientA| | | RR-ClientB| > ------------ | ------------ > |RR-ClientC| > > - 3 sets of identical Route Pools were advertised from each RR- > Client. > - The Local Preference was manipulated for those sets of Route Pools. > - RR-Client A has LP of 70 on Pool 1 and 100 on Pool 2 and 3. > - RR-Client B has LP of 70 on Pool 2 and 100 on Pool 1 and 3. > - RR-Client C has LP of 70 on Pool 3 and 100 on Pool 1 and 2. > > 3- Upon Running show ip bgp neighbor (RR-Client A) advertised routes command > on RR. > It shows only 1 route (Pool 1) reflected from RR-Client C. > 4- Upon running same command for neighbor RR-Client C, it shows 2 Pools (2 > and 3) > reflected from RR-Client A. > 5- Upon running same command for neighbor (RR-Client B), it shows 3 Route > Pools > (1,2,3) Route Pool 1 reflected from RR-Client C and Pool 2 and 3 reflected > from > RR-Client A. > > Can anyone please come-up with a comprehensive answer. > > thanks, > > _________________________________________________________________ > Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com >
Thread Index |
|
