|
<- Previous Message | Next Message -> Thread Index Re: [isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed
That's technically what happened to the CLECs. The CLECs were supposed to be paying cost, yet the RBOCs' retail pricing was less. Hrm... ---------- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "KingBloom" <lists@kingbloom.com> To: <isp-bandwidth@isp-bandwidth.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 9:41 AM Subject: Re: [isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed On Apr 30, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Hans Wolfgang Lutz wrote:On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, KingBloom wrote:Of course it would make sense.. But at this point with out a collective effort to do this across the board, you still have other companies that sell the all you can eat model. It's impossible to stay competitive unless you offer the same.Selling at a loss, but making it up on volume? Heh.We all have to agree to one model for this to work.Or not. Let those selling below cost go under. One can hope that, eventually, the lemmings of finance all splatter or drown. To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. Copyright 2007 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved. To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. Copyright 2007 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.
Thread Index |