<- Previous Message | Next Message -> Thread Index
Re: [isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed
On Apr 29, 2008, at 9:22 AM, KingBloom wrote:
I think the point being attempted here is that to the average
consumer "residential internet equals commercial internet" because
our industry advertises it as such... We keep shooting ourselves in
the foot, all under the guise of competition by continually trying
to out do one another and hence creating this all you can eat
Ponderosa buffet with limitless/huge portions and no limits.
A few comments somewhat related to this here:
<http://asert.arbornetworks.com/2008/04/net-neutralitys-unintended-consequence/
>
-danny
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016
Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
Copyright 2007 Jupitermedia Corporation All Rights Reserved.
Replies
[isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed , Alex Goldman
Re: [isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed , Scott Granados
RE: [Bulk] Re: [isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed , Hans Geiler
Re: [isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed , Peter R.
Re: [isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed , Scott Granados
Re: [isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed , Peter R.
Re: [isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed , Dennis Nugent - WCIX.Net
RE: [isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed , Robert - elists
Re: [isp-bandwidth] Om Malik supports throttling, gets flamed , KingBloom
<- Previous Message | Next Message -> Thread Index